marianvejcik-istockphoto-com-gavel-uk-
27 October 2017Big Pharma

Teva suffers defeat as Copaxone claims invalidated

The English High Court has invalidated two patent claims protecting Copaxone (glatiramer acetate), a billion-dollar drug marketed by Teva.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Big Pharma
22 May 2015   Teva has successfully defended two patents related to its blockbuster multiple sclerosis drug Copaxone (glatiramer acetate) at the English High Court.
Americas
31 January 2017   Teva will appeal against a decision which saw the invalidation of four patents covering its multiple sclerosis drug Copaxone.
Big Pharma
12 December 2017   Teva has dropped its litigation over two US patents against Mylan, after a district court adopted Mylan’s interpretation of the patents.

More on this story

Big Pharma
22 May 2015   Teva has successfully defended two patents related to its blockbuster multiple sclerosis drug Copaxone (glatiramer acetate) at the English High Court.
Americas
31 January 2017   Teva will appeal against a decision which saw the invalidation of four patents covering its multiple sclerosis drug Copaxone.
Big Pharma
12 December 2017   Teva has dropped its litigation over two US patents against Mylan, after a district court adopted Mylan’s interpretation of the patents.

More on this story

Big Pharma
22 May 2015   Teva has successfully defended two patents related to its blockbuster multiple sclerosis drug Copaxone (glatiramer acetate) at the English High Court.
Americas
31 January 2017   Teva will appeal against a decision which saw the invalidation of four patents covering its multiple sclerosis drug Copaxone.
Big Pharma
12 December 2017   Teva has dropped its litigation over two US patents against Mylan, after a district court adopted Mylan’s interpretation of the patents.