Warner-Lambert v Actavis: day one from the UK Supreme Court
LSIPR attended a packed UK Supreme Court yesterday for day one of a four-day hearing, with Warner-Lambert debating the role that plausibility plays in patent law. Below we provide an overview of the case and its core issues.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
18 January 2018 The UK Supreme Court has granted the UK BioIndustry Association permission to intervene in the case of Warner-Lambert Company v Generics and Actavis, which concerns the issue of ‘plausibility’.
18 January 2018 The UK Supreme Court has granted the UK BioIndustry Association permission to intervene in the case of Warner-Lambert Company v Generics and Actavis, which concerns the issue of ‘plausibility’.
18 January 2018 The UK Supreme Court has granted the UK BioIndustry Association permission to intervene in the case of Warner-Lambert Company v Generics and Actavis, which concerns the issue of ‘plausibility’.