Generics petition Supreme Court to save PTAB patent trials
Generic drug makers are trying to persuade the US Supreme Court to retain an administrative process for challenging patents, in the latest bid to discredit the controversial decision handed down in Arthrex v Smith & Nephew.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
27 January 2015 Generic drug makers Sandoz, Mylan and Natco have asked the US Supreme Court to immediately put into effect its ruling on the validity of a patent covering Teva’s multi-billion dollar multiple sclerosis drug Copaxone.
27 January 2015 Generic drug makers Sandoz, Mylan and Natco have asked the US Supreme Court to immediately put into effect its ruling on the validity of a patent covering Teva’s multi-billion dollar multiple sclerosis drug Copaxone.
27 January 2015 Generic drug makers Sandoz, Mylan and Natco have asked the US Supreme Court to immediately put into effect its ruling on the validity of a patent covering Teva’s multi-billion dollar multiple sclerosis drug Copaxone.