The Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) process of allowing the same three judges to decide whether to institute an inter partes review (IPR) and on the validity of the patent in question creates legal biases, Ethicon Endo-Surgery has argued.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
19 January 2016 The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that the same three administrative patent law judges who determine whether to institute an inter partes review can also rule on the validity of the patent at issue.
19 January 2016 The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that the same three administrative patent law judges who determine whether to institute an inter partes review can also rule on the validity of the patent at issue.
19 January 2016 The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that the same three administrative patent law judges who determine whether to institute an inter partes review can also rule on the validity of the patent at issue.