If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
23 March 2017 The English High Court has ruled that a supplementary protection certificate owned by Merck Sharp & Dohme is invalid because it didn’t comply with European regulations.
10 October 2016 Ireland-based biopharmaceutical company Mallinckrodt and Endo, a US healthcare business, have won a patent case against Amneal and Teva.
23 March 2017 The English High Court has ruled that a supplementary protection certificate owned by Merck Sharp & Dohme is invalid because it didn’t comply with European regulations.
10 October 2016 Ireland-based biopharmaceutical company Mallinckrodt and Endo, a US healthcare business, have won a patent case against Amneal and Teva.
23 March 2017 The English High Court has ruled that a supplementary protection certificate owned by Merck Sharp & Dohme is invalid because it didn’t comply with European regulations.
10 October 2016 Ireland-based biopharmaceutical company Mallinckrodt and Endo, a US healthcare business, have won a patent case against Amneal and Teva.