Subscribe
tetiana-yurchenko-shutterstock-com
Tetiana Yurchenko / Shutterstock.com
29 June 2015Americas

US court says ‘pay-for-delay’ settlements do not need to involve cash

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ settlements do not need to involve cash payments to be considered anticompetitive.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Americas
FTC demands corrections in GSK, Teva pay-for-delay ruling
17 March 2016   The US Federal Trade Commission has urged a federal appeals court to correct errors in a judgment from a Pennsylvania court that found the plaintiff in a pay-for-delay case had failed to prove that the agreement breached US competition law.


Editor's picks

Americas
Trump’s return sparks calls for pro-patent agenda
5 December 2024

Editor's picks

Americas
Trump’s return sparks calls for pro-patent agenda
5 December 2024
Americas
Comparing life sciences IP in Brazil and the US
28 November 2024
Americas
UPC bans Meril Life Sciences from selling infringing heart valve
19 November 2024
Americas
Amgen set for ‘at-risk’ launch of blockbuster eye drug biosimilar
24 October 2024
Americas
Big Pharma counsel embrace AI but data and legal risks loom
24 October 2024
Asia
President Xi sends message to AIPPI’s World Congress
22 October 2024

More on this story

Americas
FTC demands corrections in GSK, Teva pay-for-delay ruling
17 March 2016   The US Federal Trade Commission has urged a federal appeals court to correct errors in a judgment from a Pennsylvania court that found the plaintiff in a pay-for-delay case had failed to prove that the agreement breached US competition law.

More on this story

Americas
FTC demands corrections in GSK, Teva pay-for-delay ruling
17 March 2016   The US Federal Trade Commission has urged a federal appeals court to correct errors in a judgment from a Pennsylvania court that found the plaintiff in a pay-for-delay case had failed to prove that the agreement breached US competition law.

More features

Fed Circ orders Teva to delist five patents from Orange Book
Sarepta wins $115M in patent dispute over muscular dystrophy drug
Novartis shields eye-drop patent at European Patent Office
CREATES Act unfairly tips the scales to generics
LSPN launches its first-ever US awards to celebrate life sciences leaders
Pharma giants seek closure on COVID-19 vaccine rows
How Inhibrx defended a $450m damages suit
Foley & Lardner adds litigation and transaction expert in New York