Subscribe
olm26250-istockphoto-com-patent-2-1-
olm26250 / iStockphoto.com
28 March 2019Big Pharma

Eli Lilly defeat shows one size does not fit all in obviousness test: lawyers

The UK Supreme Court’s  decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly  confirms that a multi-factorial judgement should be used to determine whether an invention is obvious or not, lawyers have told WIPR.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Big Pharma
UK Supreme Court invalidates Eli Lilly patent relating to Cialis
27 March 2019   The UK Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Actavis (which has been acquired by Teva) and Mylan in a patent dispute against Eli Lilly, after an earlier court found that one of Eli Lilly’s patents was invalid for lacking an inventive step.


Editor's picks

Americas
Trump’s return sparks calls for pro-patent agenda
5 December 2024

Editor's picks

Americas
Trump’s return sparks calls for pro-patent agenda
5 December 2024
Americas
Comparing life sciences IP in Brazil and the US
28 November 2024
Americas
UPC bans Meril Life Sciences from selling infringing heart valve
19 November 2024
Americas
Amgen set for ‘at-risk’ launch of blockbuster eye drug biosimilar
24 October 2024
Americas
Big Pharma counsel embrace AI but data and legal risks loom
24 October 2024
Asia
President Xi sends message to AIPPI’s World Congress
22 October 2024

More on this story

Big Pharma
UK Supreme Court invalidates Eli Lilly patent relating to Cialis
27 March 2019   The UK Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Actavis (which has been acquired by Teva) and Mylan in a patent dispute against Eli Lilly, after an earlier court found that one of Eli Lilly’s patents was invalid for lacking an inventive step.

More on this story

Big Pharma
UK Supreme Court invalidates Eli Lilly patent relating to Cialis
27 March 2019   The UK Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Actavis (which has been acquired by Teva) and Mylan in a patent dispute against Eli Lilly, after an earlier court found that one of Eli Lilly’s patents was invalid for lacking an inventive step.

More features

Novartis shields eye-drop patent at European Patent Office
CREATES Act unfairly tips the scales to generics
LSPN launches its first-ever US awards to celebrate life sciences leaders
Pharma giants seek closure on COVID-19 vaccine rows
How Inhibrx defended a $450m damages suit
Foley & Lardner adds litigation and transaction expert in New York
UPC deals further blow to Dexcom in glucose monitor dispute with Abbott
‘A marathon and a sprint at the same time’: How we won $452m damages