What’s next for genus claims
In the aftermath of the Idenix v Gilead case in 2019 Dmitry Karshtedt and his co-authors published an article in the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology titled “The Death of the Genus Claim” in which they state that “in the past 30 years, there are virtually no significant examples of genus claims in the life science fields upheld on appeal as compliant with §112(a) outside the unique context of ‘interference’ proceedings”.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk